Friday, June 21, 2013

Corporation Director wiped his email files - Financieele Dagblad (Registration)

Director Andre Heintjes of housing corporation Laurentius has his administration cleaned after an integrity investigation was launched against him. He then include completely erase the contents of his cell phone and his iPad.

Laurentius: local variation of real estate fraud

geld_vastgoed . jpg

Two directors of Laurentius been suspended

laurentius_anp . jpg

Verdict subdistrict

Moreover Heintjes deleted 2268 emails from his computer last year. That’s a huge amount, “said the magistrate in Breda Friday in a judgment about the labor dispute between Heintjes and Lawrence. “This approach suggests that Heintjes had something to hide,” denounces the court. The court expects him to this behavior.

Fraud Suspicions

Heintjes is one of the three members of the management team of Lawrence when there is a fraud scandal erupted in early 2012. Initially the fraud suspicions focused mainly on general manager Walter Vermeulen. The Public Prosecutor (OM) suspects him of property fraud and corruption.

Suspension

In the course of 2012 grew within Laurentius also suspicions against the Director Customer & Market, Andre Heintjes, and by the Director of Finance, Joop Peijen. The ailing housing hoarse services both for the duration of an internal forensic investigation. Immediately after his suspension wiped Heintjes his cell phone and iPad empty, it now appears.

Day Long ‘Copy

The judgment of the district court Friday to speak more accusations of Laurentius aam address Heintjes. Thus he ‘days’ internal records of the institution copied according to the housing, where he had no right.

Alcohol

According to the district court has Heintjes consumed alcohol in the housing with great regularity at work and during work meetings. “It is the Board must abstain ‘, urges the court. It appears from the statements of Heintjes ‘under regular working hours “heavier” beer was consumed at meals by him.’

Beer Chalice against wall

‘by The Heintjes not disputed incidents where a beer chalice ended up against a wall and furniture was damaged, be considered by the court as excesses of alcohol of Heintjes on several occasions’ note the verdict. The director behaved according to the court not as the corporation was entitled to expect from him.

Blaming

Laurentius Heintjes also complains that he has assigned. residence of a corporation in violation of the rules to his mother Another criticism is that Heintjes would have stolen.

his own personnel file

Sexual misconduct

Also, staff Laurentius accuse him of sexual misconduct and creating a culture of fear within the housing. The magistrate ruled that these allegations are insufficient substantiated.

Fee

Well the judge decides that Lawrence has shown that the three controversial directors have awarded themselves. generous expenses contrary to the policy of the housing None other than the Board received a fee. In addition Heintjes got a wage that was higher than in the collective housing services was possible.

Dinners

contrary to the policy of Laurentius undeclared Heintjes also ‘often’ lunches and dinners, also for a regular person. The court may exclude from the agenda Heintjes be made for these meals. No need Such behavior, according to the court ‘not at issue ought to be. ” Also, Heintjes contrary to the rules of Laurentius a costly medical research in Germany undergoing the expense of Lawrence. The court summarizes this as’ negative example behavior.

Speak Prohibition

The judgment shows that Heintjes tacitly conceded that staff Laurentius affected by noise in the other director was ordered to at least contribute to the internal forensics. Laurentius employees received their master’s command to limit themselves to giving answers and can not be explained on the state of affairs within the housing.

spontaneously

Severance

Despite the tough criticism of the magistrate’s behavior Heintjes, the court nevertheless considers that the Director Laurentius should pass. severance The right to compensation for Heintjes brings it back to € 75,000. According to the normal court formula would have Heintjes entitled to a severance payment of € 160,000.

No comments:

Post a Comment